If the public Prosecutor of Ukraine Yury Lutsenko really wanted to retire, he would have acted in other ways, as for “business Gandzyuk,” it’s, like other high-profile murders, is unlikely to be completely solved.
Comments about this correspondent of ГолосUA said political analyst Nikolai Spiridonov.
“It was quite expected that Poroshenko is not an example of Lutsenko’s statement of resignation. Because the President has not, in any case, a quick replacement of this attorney General. If Lutsenko actually wanted to retire, he could or on sick leave then leave, or to sabotage. That is ways to retire a lot,” said the analyst.
According to N. Spiridonova, in the case Gandzyuk, the investigation somehow goes artists was detained.
“But whether they will reach the finals at the investigation…. Unfortunately, in Ukraine there is a negative trend that the resonant murder, as a rule, full disclosure of arguments. For example, the same Sheremet and Elderberry”, – he said.
We will remind, in a press-service of presidential Administration of Ukraine said that Petro Poroshenko did not accept the statement of the Prosecutor General Yury Lutsenko’s resignation from office. As reported in the AAP said that Lutsenko “important tasks”.
“The President has returned the statement of the Prosecutor General, considering that Yury Lutsenko received a vote of confidence in Parliament,” – said the press service of the presidential administration.